
La p谩gina que intenta visitar s贸lo est谩 disponible en ingl茅s. 隆Disculpa!
The page you are about to visit is currently only available in English. Sorry!

This blog was originally posted on on September 24, 2025. The Trust is co-managed by 约炮视频 and The Nature Conservancy.
You may have heard the recent news that as 10,000 acre-feet of new water flowed from storage in Utah Lake, through the Jordan River, and into Great Salt Lake鈥檚 Farmington and Gilbert Bays. This effort was made possible thanks to a partnership between 约炮视频 and The Nature Conservancy, as managers of the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust (the Trust), Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, and the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands.
Late-season water flows, such as this release, are important for a multitude of reasons鈥攖hey help mitigate botulism in birds, sustain lake levels and salinity (salt) levels during the dry season, and can improve the riparian and wetland ecosystems that the water moves through on its journey.
This year, though, these new water flows provided an additional opportunity for the Utah Division of Water Quality (UDWQ) to conduct the Jordan River Flushing Flow Study鈥攔esearch that aims to better understand the health of Jordan River鈥檚 waters and the impact of using water flows to mitigate adverse ecological conditions, especially in warmer, drier months.
鈥淭he timing for this study was serendipitous. UDWQ waited a long time to have the required elevated flows to conduct this research, and this year鈥檚 late-season release came through in the nick of time,鈥 said Jodi Gardberg, Section Manager for the Utah Division of Water Quality鈥檚 Watershed Protection Section.
When Jodi says they鈥檝e waited a long time, she means it. The Jordan River Flush Flow Study is the culmination of nearly 15 years of research, modeling, and planning to improve water quality in the Jordan River.
In the early 2010s, the Utah Division of Water Quality conducted a water quality test that determined the lower Jordan River had dissolved oxygen (DO) levels too low to sustain warm water aquatic life. This placed the Jordan River on the Clean Water Act鈥檚 303(d) List of impaired waters鈥攁 list of waterbodies that fail to meet water quality standards necessary to protect their beneficial use, such as aquatic ecosystems.
Once a waterbody is placed on the 303(d) list, UDWQ develops a water quality restoration plan (otherwise known as a Total Maximum Daily Load Study) to determine what鈥檚 causing the impairment, including an implementation plan to rectify the situation.
鈥淭he TMDL was approved in 2013, and it essentially found a ton of organic matter gobbling up all of the oxygen, leaving little left to support fish and other aquatic life,鈥 explained Sandy Wingert, an environmental scientist who鈥檚 been with UDWQ since 2007 and manages surface water quality concerns in the Provo and Jordan River Basins.
The initial water quality plan proposed that an increase in water flow could lead to a benefit in dissolved oxygen levels. To test this idea, Sandy and her team needed increased water flows, but navigating the complex system of water rights to secure those flows proved challenging.
To accomplish these experiments, a large collaboration of partners was key to facilitating the distribution and delivery of increased water into the lower Jordan River from Utah Lake. Staff from the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust and UDWQ coordinated closely over the last year with water managers to work out all of the fine-scale details needed to make the experiment happen:
All of these partners were instrumental in ensuring that the additional flows, with the target flow rates and timing, reached the lower Jordan River while also preventing the additional water from adversely impacting managed wetlands downstream.
鈥淭his really highlights that the Jordan River is a highly controlled system, with so many entities involved in water management. We are really appreciative of all of the efforts of partners who have contributed to make this experiment possible,鈥 said Jodi.
Before the increase in flow in the lower Jordan River, UDWQ鈥檚 crew collected pre-experiment data to determine baseline conditions.
September 15th marked the first day of a 5-day ramp-up as water incrementally increased through the lower Jordan River System to about 50 additional cfs, or cubic feet per second, above base flows (typically around 150 cfs in the stretch of the Jordan River this time of year). During this ramp-up period, field staff were out two times a day at nine individual monitoring locations between 2100 South and all the way down to Farmington Bay Waterfowl Management Area (WMA).
鈥淭hree of these already have flow gauges, and four have long-term sensors that measure field parameters such as DO and water temperature,鈥 explained Sandy.
This gives their team the ability to not only utilize historic DO rates but also monitor the real-time relationship between DO and flow. Additionally, UDWQ installed temporary DO loggers at the remaining sites.
While at each monitoring station, the crew is collecting chemical samples as well as flow rates. Chemical sampling is done by collecting water at each site for analysis.
How do they measure flow? With a Q-Boat of course.
As functional as it is cute, this small boat is outfitted with equipment to rapidly calculate the flow rate, ensuring the validity of the experiment and saving the crew significant time.
A few of the Trust鈥檚 staff had the opportunity to join three of UDWQ鈥檚 field staff as they conducted their first day of research. The excitement was evident, and the crew moved quickly through all nine sites before their final sampling just above where the Jordan River enters Farmington Bay WMA.
After the ramp-up period, the max flow was held for 5 days, followed by a 5-day ramp back down. Crews sampled every 2-3 days during these periods.
It will take six months for the water chemistry results to come back, but with the real-time continuous DO and temperature data, UDWQ鈥檚 team will have a good idea of what鈥檚 occurring.
鈥淯DWQ鈥檚 focus is on improving water quality in the lower Jordan River. While we don鈥檛 have control over the quantity of water, the information gained from this study can inform those who manage flows,鈥 said Jodi. 鈥淭he larger question is then, can we manage flow regimes to improve and maintain the habitat quality and to sustain the water quality over time?鈥
A question that speaks to the ever-increasing truth that in a watershed where everything is connected, proactive management and mitigation, such as increased flow, have benefits that reach far beyond the intended subject. Greater water downstream not only provides benefits for Great Salt Lake and Jordan River, but also our understanding of how to better manage the Jordan River to benefit everyone.
Post-flow fieldwork will wrap up at the end of September, and the results will be shared with the public and water managers within the next year. In the meantime, partners like the Trust are grateful to Sandy, Jodi, and the entire team at UDWQ for their persistence and passion as we all work together to better understand how we can care for and manage some of our state鈥檚 most crucial ecosystems.